This research explores how media messaging about sedentary behavior affects people with spinal cord injuries. Through qualitative interviews, participants described “sitting is the new smoking” headlines as offensive and exclusionary. The study advocates more accurate, inclusive scientific communication and is helping develop media guidelines that better reflect the realities of disability and health.

This study examines “status-striving sleep deprivation,” where lack of sleep signals status. It tests whether infographics can shift perceptions by highlighting work or health consequences. Findings aim to reduce glorification of sleep deprivation, challenge gendered interpretations, and promote healthier workplace norms, improving wellbeing and organizational effectiveness.

This study evaluated QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) suicide prevention training among 2,000 professionals. Results showed significant improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and intervention skills, though effects varied by profession. Findings suggest QPR is effective but may require tailored approaches to maximize impact across different occupational groups.

This research investigates COVID-19 stigma among survivors in Nepal during the pandemic. It found that one-quarter experienced discrimination, social exclusion, and psychological distress. Misinformation, weak health-system preparedness, and lack of public trust fuelled stigma. The study argues that future pandemic preparedness must address social stigma alongside healthcare capacity.

This research examines how “sitting is the new smoking” headlines affect people with spinal cord injury. Interviews revealed these messages are harmful and exclusionary. Reframing sedentary behavior as low energy expenditure, rather than sitting itself, improves understanding. The work promotes inclusive, evidence-based public health communication.